The data is expressed by instantiating specific types of entities, relationships, and concrete resources they are associated with, and assigning roles to the instances played for particular relationships. There are three types of data instances:
Entities: instances of entity types, for example,
insert $x isa person creates an instance of the entity type
Resources: instances of attribute types being associated with particular instances, for example,
insert $x isa person, has name "Elisabeth Niesz" creates an instance of a
person with the attribute type
name given the value “Elizabeth Niesz”. The unique identifiers for all instances are defined internally within the Grakn system.
Relations: instances of relationship types, for example,
insert (employee:$x, employer:$y) isa employment creates an instance of the relationship type
$x, playing the role of
$y, playing the role of
insert $x isa person, has name "Elizabeth Niesz"; $y isa company, has name "Grakn Labs"; (employee: $x, employer: $y) isa employment; commit
commitis useful only when you interact with graql console, do not use it when you import data from terminal
To ensure data is correctly structured (i.e. consistent) with respect to the schema, all data instances are validated against the schema constraints. All the explicitly represented schema constraints, together with the inherited ones, form complete schema templates for particular concept types, which guide the validation.
We will consider the structural validation rules that are enforced in a Grakn knowledge graph. The following consistency checks are executed upon
commit depending on what is being committed:
Plays Role Validation
This validation rule simply checks if an entity (which is a role player in a relationship) is allowed to play the role it has been allocated to.
The following insertion will fail, because it is attempting to form an
employment relationship between two
person entities, rather than a
person and a
insert $x isa person, has name "Elizabeth Niesz"; $y isa person, has name "John Niesz"; (employee: $x, employer: $y) isa employment; commit
This validation rule ensures that abstract types do not have any instances. For example if we declare the type
vehicle to be abstract, with
motorbike to be sub types of
vehicle, then only cars and motorbikes are allowed to have instances.
This rule checks that non abstract roles are part of a relationship. For example if we declare the role
husband and forget to link it to any relationship, then this check will fail.
A relationship is valid if:
- all of the role players of the relationship are allowed to play their corresponding roles.
- it has, at minimum, two roles. For example, a
marriagewith only one role
husbandwould fail this check.
An Example of Validation
Let us say that we want to model a marriage between a man
Bob and woman
This will be our first attempt:
define human is-abstract sub entity; human has name; name sub attribute datatype string; man is-abstract sub human; woman sub human; marriage sub relationship; marriage relates husband; woman plays wife; insert $x has name 'Bob' isa man; $y has name 'Alice' isa woman; (husband: $x, wife: $y) isa marriage;
This first attempt was horrible as we ended up failing all the validation rules. On commit we will see an error similar to this:
The Type [man] is abstract and cannot have any instances # (1)
Then we will see also the following ones:
A structural validation error has occurred. Please correct the [`3`] errors found. Role [wife] does not have a relates connection to any Relationship Type. # (2) The relation [V24656] has a role player playing the role [wife] which it's type [marriage] is not connecting to via a relates connection # (3) The type [man] of role player [V41176] is not allowed to play Role [husband] # (4)
Lets see why:
Type Validation failed because we accidentally made
manabstract and we declared
Bobto be an instance of
Role Validation failed because the role
wifeis not connected to any relationship
Relationship Validation failed because
marriageonly has one role
Plays Role Validation failed because we forgot to say that a
mancan play the role of
Let’s fix these issues and try again:
define human is-abstract sub entity; human has name; name sub attribute datatype string; man sub human; # Fix (1) woman sub human; marriage sub relationship; marriage relates husband; marriage relates wife; # Fix (2) and (3) man plays husband; # Fix (4) woman plays wife; insert $x has name 'Bob' isa man; $y has name 'Alice' isa woman; (husband: $x, wife: $y) isa marriage;
Now we are correctly modelling the marriage between